Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with details as summarized below:? M.L. Tossuwan, Premchai, Apinuntakan, Sarunya, and Kitja for ratifying GEN?s prior investment in P Plus P Plc. ' s shares and warrants
considered in contravention of the second paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307 and 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with Sections 83 and 86 of the
outstanding shares of the infrastructure company. Types of infrastructure include rail system, toll way, electricity, water supply, airport, deep sea port, telecommunication and alternative energy, providing
million in 2009, respectively.Their actions were in violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code
case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were
unlawful gains for the benefit of herself and others, in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Phra Suthep Arpassaro (Panpai) and Vachala Pisitsak were also
) for falsifying the company?s documents and accounts in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The SEC?s finding indicated that Somchit proceeded or permitted
2019, (2) Global Service Center Public Company Limited (GSC) on 13 December 2019, (3) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019, and (4) Floyd Public Company Limited (FLOYD
Center Public Company Limited (GSC) on 13 December 2019, (3) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019, (4) Floyd Public Company Limited (FLOYD) on 20 December 2019 between
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code, subject to the penalties under Section 296, Section 296/1 and Section 296/2 and civil sanctions under