any way. The SEC has considered that Pongsak’s misconduct of performing duties irresponsibly without professional due care is in violation of Clause 23(2) and he is deemed to have the prohibited

of duty is found.  The aforesaid misconduct is in violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of Business

worth approximately 50 billion baht to take over a listed company that had long been established for more than 20 years in the same industry as WHA with a multiple P/E of 10. His misconduct with regard to

Novermber at 17.41 hours (after SET closing). His misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).   

orders sent through him for several days. {A} admitted that the securities trading orders were taken via mobile phone; the misconduct of which he had previously committed. In case of {B}, the SEC found

companies from the Bank of Thailand. Invitation letters for seminars, information on the consideration of wrongdoing, information on the results of inspection; The Enterprise Content Management System of the

agencies: Data for consideration of approval and inspection of wrongdoings from the Bank of Thailand (BOT), the Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC). In the case where no wrongdoing is detected, the SEC

in big volumes. Such trading manipulation took place during 10-27 September 2013, causing YCI price and trading volume to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. The wrongdoing was assisted

kind of wrongdoing.?Information contained in this news release is as of the aforementioned release date. For those who wish to see current status of the matter, please go to compliant filed with inquiry

derivatives products to deposit money into banking accounts of two securities companies for Sureerat?s derivatives trading account. Such wrongdoing was in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E