296/2 of the SEA, as the case may be. The Civil Sanction Committee (CSC) has therefore resolved to impose civil sanctions on the 14 offenders above, as summarized below:      (a) The offenders are

(1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/2 and civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the SEA.  The Civil

subject to penalties under Section 296, Section 296/2, as well as civil sanctions under Section 317/4 and Section 317/5 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA);       (2) Mrs. Teo Lee Ngo

297 of the SEA.The Civil Sanction Committee has decided to impose civil sanctions** on the three offenders through the imposition of civil penalty, compensation at an equal amount to the benefit

under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the SEA.The Civil Sanction Committee has decided to impose civil sanctions* on the three offenders above through the imposition of civil penalty, compensation at

Sanction Committee has decided to impose civil sanctions** on the three offenders through the imposition of civil penalty, compensation at an equal amount to the benefit received or should have been received

pay 500,000 baht, and (13) Praphol to pay 22,782,360 baht. In addition, the civil sanctions have caused 12 ordinary person offenders to have untrustworthy characteristics of director or executive of

statements for the second quarter of 2018 to SET on 14 August 2018. The action of Chantip contravened Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1) which were subject to civil sanctions under Section

civil sanction. However, if any offender declines to comply with the civil sanctions ruled by the Civil Sanction Committee, SEC will seek an assistance from Public Attorney to file a civil lawsuit with

Bangkok, 9 November 2017 ? The Civil Sanction Committee has imposed civil sanctions on four persons, namely (1) Mr. Surachai Suwanthanakul, (2) Mrs. Orthai Sae-tung, (3) Mr. Somsak Saravutwattanakorn