in the audit firm who has an influence on the applicant’s giving of opinions, including the spouse and minor children, of the person with equivalent authority, of other partners or equivalent, of other

an influence on the applicant’s giving of opinions, including the spouse and minor children, of the person with equivalent authority, of other partners or equivalent, of other licensed CPAs or of

transaction Interested directors Mr. Wijit Techakasem and Mr. Tanapat Tantiwattanawijit, left the meeting and ineligible to vote. (7) Opinions by the Company’s Board of Directors The Board of Directors’ meeting

the Stock Exchange of Thailand 6. Source of fund Company’s working capital 7. Opinions of the Audit Committee having differing opinions from the Board of Directors The Audit Committee viewed that the

board of directors has not unanimously approved the regulations, the number of dissenting directors shall be indicated and the conclusion of dissenting opinions shall also be included; (3) opinions of the

’ qualified opinions resulted from limitation on their scope of audit/review. Hence, the auditors were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to valuation of investment in PT

supporting reasons, and clearly provide information to the bondholders together with the opinions of the bondholder representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the

approval and decline of approval for the above matters with respective supporting reasons, and clearly provide information to the bondholders together with the opinions of the bondholder representative

information to the bondholders together with the opinions of the bondholder representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the information and exercise their rights to protect

and the opinions of the bondholders’ representative. The bondholders are, therefore, encouraged to thoroughly review the information and exercise their rights to protect their own interests. They should