orders as well as incompletely prepared such documents as determined by the company. Thus, the SEC publicly disclosed her inappropriate behavior and recorded such behavior for future reference if breach
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition
acts of Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In
the cancelation of the power plant project. These actions rendered the conditions unfeasible, resulting in total damages of 156.8 million baht to IEC. The actions of these four individuals were a breach
breach of duty through fraudulent conduct, misappropriation of assets, and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves or others, causing harm to IEC. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry
of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official