anything, nor earned any returns as earlier claimed. She later evaded causing damage of some 6.94 million baht; 3. {D}, a bank officer, dishonestly used the branch manager's password to access the bank's

cash or transferred the money to the juristic person claimed to be an agent from Hong Kong SAR or through currency exchange company in Thailand.According to the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), any

issuers affected by the earthquake.SET President Asadej Kongsiri affirmed that the fundamentals of listed companies remain strong and their competitiveness were not compromised by the earthquake incident as

competitiveness in preparation for the AEC in the very near future? affirmed Dr. Vorapol.The ?Pride of the Province? project is the collaboration between the SEC and its alliances, including the Ministry of

value of the legal rights over the two coal mines, worth approximately 25.1 billion baht and 29 billion baht, according to the assessment reports of two appraisal companies which EARTH claimed to have

. He also claimed that the share issuer would increase capital shares and be allowed to resume trading on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The client was interested in such deal but only had money for

a company in a client’s trading account by asking the client to sell the shares and transfer the redemption money into her own deposit account. She claimed that she would use the money to invest in

Thai Baht. 11 . Loss from compensation of damages was Baht 11.81 million equivalent to 100% compared to the same period of the previous year as a result of the damages claimed by the injured party

2018, apart from normal administrative expense, the company also incurred loss from the fire incident as expense amounted Baht 710 million. On the other hand, insurance claimed revenue was recognized

. {F} admitted that some of the unrecorded trading orders were taken via mobile phone and claimed that others were also the client's orders but he failed to show evidence of records of such trading