3,858,100 BIG shares by utilizing the non-public information he accessed by virtue of his position. Such information was the annual financial statement of 2015 operating results showed the net earnings, which
the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC's probe found that during November 9-22, 2012, {A} purchased 1,786,100 {X1} Company shares based on the company positive non-public information
traded {X1} Company shares in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to {X1} Company share price which was {X1} Company's 315.79 million operating net loss in
July 27 ? August 10, 2011, Yongyuth, then CEO of TUCC, told Vorakun to sell 17,475,100 TUCC shares in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to TUCC share
percent of its shares in the manner that taking an advantage over other investors due to the use of negative non-public information material to {X1} share price. The said information was about {X1}'s Q1
securities trading account of another person for her own or others? benefits in such a way that taking advantage of others. The selling was made by using material non-public information concerning a 129.83
intimates for their own benefits. The purchases were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to RPC share price. The information, of which they learnt as
were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to {X1} Company share price. The information, of which they learnt as {X1} Company directors, was about
non-public information material to SPSU share price. As {A} was one of the sellers comprising SPSU, S.P. International Co., Ltd. (SPI) and some of family members, they learnt of a draft Memorandum of
objectives: 1) To specify that only limited companies and non-listed public companies are eligible for the crowdfunding model; 2) To grant oversubscription upon meeting certain requirements; 3) To increase