SEC?s probe found that during April 23 ? May 14, 2012, Sermkhun had purchased CMO shares through his securities trading account by using non-public information material to CMO share price concerning CMO
this case, the SEC?s probe found that Yongyuth and Vorapin had sold TUCC shares in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to TUCC share price. They learnt of
shares through Ziriwat?s securities trading account. Their actions were considered as taking an advantage over other investors due to their use of non-public information on Pulto LNG Project value where
based on the company positive non-public information material to {X1} share price. It was the information on merger of {X1} with {X2} Plc. by means of entire business transfer during 2010-2011. The merger
. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.343 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 18/12/2009
of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06
Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06/2010
Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23