(Thailand) Public Company Limited (“SANKO”) shares held by itself, and person under section 258 resulting in TIP aggregate number of shares held by other persons exceeded trigger point at 25 percent of the

period specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board after Mr.Pira had acquired SANKO shares so that the acquisition or disposal of such shares caused Mr. Pira aggregate holding of

Capital Market Supervisory Board after Mr.Tim had acquired EA shares so that the acquisition or disposal of such shares caused Mr. Tim aggregate holding of EA shares held by itself, and persons under

(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) Codified up to No. 10 As of 28 February 2020 Readers should be aware that only the original Thai text has legal force and that this English translation is strictly for reference. Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. Tor Jor. 3/2558 Re: Provisions relating to Offer for Sale of Shares Issued by Foreign Company Whose Shares Are Not Traded on Foreign Exchange _______________ By virtue of Sections 16/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as...

amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 and Section 63(5) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 which contains certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and

’ qualified opinions resulted from limitation on their scope of audit/review. Hence, the auditors were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence with respect to valuation of investment in PT

concerning the limitation of the voting rights and the disclosure requirement over the one-third rule so that asset management companies can disclose such information to investors. The afore-mentioned

limitation on examination by the company?s executives regarding the company?s misuse of proceeds received from increase of capital by investing in common shares and warrants of P Plus P Plc. The proceeds used

.  Earlier, the SEC notified SINGHA to rectify its 2010 financial statements (submitted to the SEC on February 27, 2012) due to limitation of audit scope by the company?s management causing the auditor to

statements, earlier extended to May 31, 2012. Previously, the SEC ordered PRO to rectify its 2011 financial statements due to the limitation of audit scope by the company?s management on the matters concerning