}. However, after fact examination, it was found that there was a reasonable ground to believe that the actual payment for the purchase of the land and the office building was 40 million baht, and the

working for Asia Plus Securities Co., Ltd. at the time of misconduct.Following the inspection report submitted by Asia Plus Securities and the subsequent examination conducted by the SEC, it was found that

trading decisions for the client. From examination of communications records, there was no sources of the orders; just transaction confirmations made by such investment consultant and the conversations

for such trading was made from the client account by {A} without the knowledge of the client.The {B} case was also lodged by an investor. The SEC's finding from an examination of conversation records

; assets to SEC with information that did not align with the facts found by the SEC's examination. This resulted in the consideration that Mr. Akalarp committed or permitted Zipmex Thailand to make

, [ii] attend training courses or pass the examination of courses provided by the SEC Office or the organizations recognized by the SEC Office and [iii] have scope of duties, as specified in the Tables of

the requesting and using of investor’s account for personal trading, even with the investor’s consent. Such conduct is deemed a prohibited characteristic for capital market business personnel under the

failure to perform her duties or provide services with honesty and good faith, which is deemed a prohibited characteristic for capital market business personnel under the Notification of the Capital

investor of similar characteristic as the persons defined under section 3 of the Derivatives Act, B.E. 2546 (2003) or those mentioned in subsection (1) to (9) mutatis mutandis . Clause 2. This Notification

investor of similar characteristic as the persons defined under section 3 of the Derivatives Act, B.E. 2546 (2003) or those mentioned in subsection (1) to (9) mutatis mutandis. Clause 2. This Notification