% in 9M/2021. The increase was mainly due to a higher increase in total revenue than total expenses, as a result of the Company’s efficient cost management. E B I T D A a n d E B I T D A M A R G I N
Company’s ability to manage costs and expenses efficiently. Q1/2024 vs Q1/2023 Unit: THB Million 34 54 Q1/23 Q1/24 12.7% 15.7% 59% 6. Financial Cost: Financial cost arises from the recognition of interest
Profit Margin 6 12 15 Q1/21 Q1/22 6.6% 7.5% 6. Finance Cost: Finance cost arises from the recognition of lease liabilities from the adoption of Thai Financial Reporting Standards 16 Leases (TFRS 16). The
% from 31 December 2021. The increase was due to the increase in net profit of Q1/2022 and Q2/2022. Unit: Million THB 4. Finance Cost: Finance cost arises from the recognition of interest expenses from the
due to the increase in profit of THB 210 million in 9M/2024, offset by the 2023 annual dividend payment of THB 171 million in May 2024. 8 6. Financial Cost: Financial cost arises from the recognition of
the Company in Q1/2023 Q1/22 Q1/23 Change +/(-) (THB million) %YoY Operating Revenue 198 264 33% Cost of Sales (78) (96) (23%) Gross Profit 120 168 40% Other income 3 4 33% Selling and Distribution
, resulting in higher revenue recognition together with the increase electricity sales volume corresponding to EGAT’s dispatch instruction and the decrease in maintenance cost as a result of the expiration of
increasing 6.0% QoQ from full-quarter recognition of TTTBB’s cost and higher utility cost from higher FT rate. • Other costs of service was at Bt2,594mn, increasing 4.3% YoY from higher IDD cost in-line with
4 The objective of this termination of the leasehold rights transaction was to reduce the cost of the Company incurred from the recognition of project cost since it entered into such lease agreement
leasehold rights transaction was to reduce the cost of the Company incurred from the recognition of project cost since it entered into such lease agreement in 2014. Since then, Project MET has not started any