are as follows: 1.     The companies required to meet the same qualifications and the requirement of information disclosure as the issuers are the affiliates that act as the central companies. The

of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn

approval from the SEC was in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Criminal Fining Committee therefore has

which will act as initial screener of ICO issuer. After the related notifications come into effect, SEC will initially approve ICO portals. ICO portals must be Thai companies with a minimum registered

According to the first paragraph of Section 23 of Provident Fund Act, when an employee’s membership terminates on a cause other than the dissolution of the fund, the fund manager shall make

securities companies. In this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities trading practices are also listed as a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), the SEC has

execution of the scheme.Their actions were in violation of Sections 243 (1), (2) in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code

securities without approval in the category of debenture in violation of Section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The SEC has therefore filed separate complaints against the four

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., imprisonment for up to two years or a

taking an unfair advantage of other persons in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992.In this case, the offender refused to enter