public. These actions form the basis of two charges against the accused 09/01/2026 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

/2026 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 500,000.00 Baht    

Information Transmission System. Such misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which was effective at the

from the latest Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) in 2019, requesting SEC to amend the Securities and Exchange Act to impose sanctions on the audit firms in the capital market.“In addition

which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under

securities law, pushing forward the enactment of important laws, and strengthening sanctions against non-compliances.Furthermore, the SEC plans to drive the Thai capital market to become a regional investment

from December 31, 2011.  Details of the sanctions are as follows: Ten-year revocations: 1. Aunyapat Aroonjarhuspong (formerly named Nathaphan Jaiudom), an investor contact of KGI Securities (Thailand

committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff. The Civil Court also imposed civil sanctions as follows: (1) The 1st defendant shall pay the civil penalty in the amount of 2,000,000 Baht with

exchange business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree, for which OKX has not obtained a license, in violation of Section 26, and subject to offenses and penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency

is considered a violation of Section 26, resulting in an offense liable to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. The actions of Arrom and Natach are deemed