, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served. For {B}, the SEC suspended her from duty as the approved equity investment consultant for one month, effective from March 16, 2015
judgment in relation to Suree that she was an aider and abettor rather than a principal, and thus sentenced her to a four-month imprisonment and a fine of 133,333.33 baht for the violation which occurred
admitted that the client, at the beginning, had authorized him to make securities and derivatives trading decisions on her behalf. Also, the recorded conversation found later indicated that the client
in the capital market*, the SEC, therefore suspended the approval as capital market investment consultant of {A} for 9 months. Having considered that she had already been suspended by her employer for
showed that a number of clients' securities trading orders were not completely recorded. For {C}, the first investigation revealed that she failed to completely record her advice and a client's securities
worth investor ,” and “ high net worth investor ” shall have the same meanings as the definitions of such terms specified in the Notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the
Act (No. 2) B.E. 2542 (1999), the Capital Market Supervisory Board hereby issues the following regulations: Clause 1 In this Notification: 1The terms, “institutional investor,” “ultra-high net worth
the part relating to his or her responsibility, incorrect and incomplete information and functioning of the computer system, failure to achieve information or utilise computer system consistently or in