รัฐมนตรีว่าการกระทรวงดิจิทัลเพื่อเศรษฐกิจและสังคม เพื่อยกย่องเกียรติคุณให้กับหน่วยงานที่มีส่วนร่วมในการผลักดันและขับเคลื่อน พ.ร.บ. คุ้มครองข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล พ.ศ. 2562 (Personal Data Protection Act, B.E. 2562
ข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล พ.ศ. 2562 (Personal Data Protection Act, B.E. 2562 (2019)) ในงาน “PDPA Going Forward ก้าวไปข้างหน้ากับ PDPA” ซึ่งจัดโดยสำนักงานคณะกรรมการคุ้มครองข้อมูลส่วนบุคคล (สคส.) ร่วมกับ สมาคมเจ้า
violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. As they declined to enter the settlement
recently approved regulations on municipal bond offerings by public sector organizations under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The regulations, to be effective on January 1, 2015, will
which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under
report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated
gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor
case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were
to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was subject to a criminal fine penalty. Given that the benefit he had received was lower than the minimum fine of
the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in