Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with details as summarized below:? M.L. Tossuwan, Premchai, Apinuntakan, Sarunya, and Kitja for ratifying GEN?s prior investment in P Plus P Plc. ' s shares and warrants

considered in contravention of the second paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307 and 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with Sections 83 and 86 of the

, respectively, to lure the investing public into their businesses.The aforesaid acts are deemed undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546

offence under Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/10 and Section 89/11, and liable to the penalties under the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. The

of Directors pursuant to Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).KC must submit the amended financial statements, the Forms, and the results of the special audit to the SEC by

under the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546, it is therefore necessary to relax regulations to remove obstacle on business operation and enable more channels for managing risk from on exchange derivatives trading

) June 23-24, 2008. Earlier on February 17, 2011, the Settlement Committee under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) had imposed fines in the amounts of 16,071,788.32 baht and 4,563,791.25 baht

in such a way that the receiver of the benefits from such trading is the same person. These offenses were in violation of Sections 243 and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in

POWER-P Plc. (POWER), for violating Sections 307, 311 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) by collusively falsifying POWER accounts worth totaling 34 million baht with

of exchange issued, accepted or avaled by or drawn on financial institution will no longer be exempted but will be defined and regulated as securities under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535