recently approved regulations on municipal bond offerings by public sector organizations under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The regulations, to be effective on January 1, 2015, will

which were investment in gold futures, not spot gold. Accordingly, the actions of G.O.L. (Thailand) were in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16, subject to sanctions under

report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated

gather information in a case of using inside information to purchase shares of a listed company in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). {A}, a financial advisor

case and found that the aforesaid persons jointly operated securities business without a license in violation of Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA). The said actions were

to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was subject to a criminal fine penalty. Given that the benefit he had received was lower than the minimum fine of

the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in

and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in December 2014, it was after the SEC's probe had revealed such

Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. Their actions therefore were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000

unlawful gains for the benefit of herself and others, in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Phra Suthep Arpassaro (Panpai) and Vachala Pisitsak were also