sanction proceedings against Apichart, Eng and Supanee requiring each offender to  pay civil monetary penalty, disgorge the benefits of loss avoided from committing the offenses, and reimburse the SEC’s

lawsuit against Surin in the Civil, pressing for civil sanctions with the highest legal penalty. SEC has sought the Court’s ruling to require Surin to pay a civil fine, compensate the benefits received

sanctions comprise a total fine of 27,398,667 baht (a civil penalty, a compensation in the amount equal to the benefit received or is entitled to be received, and a reimbursement of investigative expenses

will also require NMG Chairman of the Board to make clarification according to normal procedure. If non-compliance with the said provision is found, the SEA prescribes the penalty under the first

to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was subject to a criminal fine penalty. Given that the benefit he had received was lower than the minimum fine of

prior to the specified period will be subject to tax penalty. The client insisted on selling those units, reasoning that he did not claim LTF tax benefits from this portion. {A}, however, did not inform

committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed civil sanctions, as follow: a civil penalty, a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the

violating multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision carrying the heaviest punishment, namely, the offense of operating a digital

paragraph is added: ‘For the purpose of Article 46(1) of Directive 2006/43/EC, the public oversight, quality assurance, investigation and penalty systems for auditors and audit entities of the following third

offenders above, as summarized below:   (1) The offenders – namely, Satit and Sirivat – are required to separately pay a civil monetary penalty and a reimbursement of the investigative expenses incurred by