Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a penalty fine of 80,995,415.67 baht on him.In this regard, the SEC appreciated cooperation and assistance

evening.His action was deemed using inside information to take advantage of the others in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and thus liable to the penalty

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). The areas of assessment consist of (1) basic requirements and (2) bonus and penalty, the result of which will be distributed in 2013

penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the audited financial statements for the year 2012, the Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 20,000 Baht and a

multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision carrying the heaviest punishment, namely, the offense of operating a digital asset

market. In addition, there were records of the doubtful debt of the long trade receivables, the employee expenses such as bonus and the provision for penalty on project delay. Therefore, comparing the

Section 317/5 of the SEA. Jakkaphong, as a person responsible for the operations of the legal entity, caused JKN to commit the aforementioned offense. He is therefore subject to the same penalty under

penalty and a reimbursement of the SEC’s investigative expenses, totaling 982,265 baht, and prohibiting him from serving as director or executive of securities issuing companies or securities companies for

Sanction Committee (CSC) has therefore resolved to impose a civil sanction* on Mr. Pongsak Lothongkam, requiring him to pay a civil penalty, a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit received, and a

) under consideration, the penalty already served, the impacts, damage or benefits generated, rectification or other actions benefiting or hindering SEC’s operation, and the record or other past behaviors