person undertaking derivatives business without obtaining proper authorization from the SEC in contravention of Section 16 of the Act shall be criminally liable under Section 125 of  the Act. The SEC

{X1} and their supporters above were liable to be the offenses under Section 307, Section 311, Section 313 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with

result, the trading of TAPAC shares contradicted normal market conditions. The manipulation of the TAPAC shares by the aforesaid persons is deemed an offense under Section 243(1) in conjunction with

, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The

Section 19(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No.4) B.E. 2535 (1992) which contains certain provisions on restriction of rights and

Corporation Public Company Limited (STARK), remains effective until the court orders otherwise pursuant to Section 267 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The extension of the asset attachment

impact on investors and shareholders.  Since the Commerce Ministry’s Department of Business Development (DBD) rejected an IFEC application to register Mr. Wiphu Maharakkakla and Mr. Manusak

Bangkok, 21 September 2016 ? The SEC has filed a criminal complaint with the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) against Mr. Khumsup Lochaya for insider trading of Superblock Public Company

Department of Special Investigation (DSI) for further legal proceedings.Their actions were in contravention of the first paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 of the Securities and

issues with the Department of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce [thus currently unqualified to work], (3) execution of a contract to buy and sell a land in the Phaholyothin area with a prior