Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA and Section

all offenders in this case were impleaded according to the evidence obtained from investigation process. “The SEC has taken actions according to the authority under the SEA and collaborated with

competitiveness and financial security, and to strengthen the overall market stability. The consultation paper on the draft amendment to the SEA regarding the CMDF establishment and the details thereof are

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a penalty fine of 80,995,415.67 baht on him.In this regard, the SEC appreciated cooperation and assistance

evening.His action was deemed using inside information to take advantage of the others in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and thus liable to the penalty

deemed manipulation of TYM share price in violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code

were all sold out during low price period.  The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). In this regard, the Settlement Committee imposed a fine of 768,925 on Arnonchai. Due to his previous offence on share price manipulation, the Settlement Committee

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about