) Global Service Center Public Company Limited (GSC) on 13 December 2019 (3) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019 (as the case may be) by placing trading orders or trading
2019, (3) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019, and (4) Raja Ferry Port Public Company Limited (RP) between 23 January 2020 at 3.13.08 p.m. and 24 January 2022 at
2019, (3) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019, (4) Floyd Public Company Limited (FLOYD) on 20 December 2019 between 10.05.35 a.m. and 11.56.02 a.m., and (5) Raja
, (2) Asian Sea Corporation Public Company Limited (ASIAN) on 16 December 2019, and (3) Floyd Public Company Limited (FLOYD) on 20 December 2019 between 10.05.35 a.m. and 11.56.02 a.m. (as the case may
Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the
be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about
/5 and 244/6, as the case may be, subject to the liabilities under Sections 296, 296/1 and 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the
market condition, misleading other investors that the securities were in great demand, are deemed a violation of Sections 244/3 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) in conjunction