. Pongsak Lothongkam’s action constitutes an offense for buying securities while knowing or possessing inside information as specified in Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), Section 243(2) and
submission of an incorrect 56-1 One Report for the year 2022 and the disclosure of false information or concealment of material facts that should have been disclosed, in violation of Section 56(3)(4) and
/2553 Re: Approval of Auditors in the Capital Market Whereas Section 61, Section 89, Section 106, Section 199 and Section 217 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), and Section 140 of the
with the SEC, thus causing it to be an unapproved share offering.NEWS private placement without the SEC approval was in violation of Section 33 and liable to the penalties under Section 268 of the
through Rinnapa?s account by executing trading orders in inappropriate manners.The acts of Lalana, Sippakorn and Rinnapa were considered contravention of Section 243 (1) in conjunction with Section 244 and
being traded in great volume and the price was changing inconsistently with normal market conditions, to lure the public into trading such shares. Somchai?s offense was in violation of Section 243 (1
Supervisory Board No. Tor Thor. 1/2560 Re: Provision of Services to Clients regarding Investment in Capital Market Products Denominated in Foreign Currency ____________________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and
____________________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008) , Section 114 and Section 116 of
____________________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 113 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551 (2008), Section 114 and Section 116 of