securities without approval in the category of debenture in violation of Section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The SEC has therefore filed separate complaints against the four
Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., imprisonment for up to two years or a
taking an unfair advantage of other persons in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992.In this case, the offender refused to enter
the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). They all agreed to enter the criminal fining process.Consequently, Somporn was fined at the amount of 612,500 baht
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with details as summarized below:? M.L. Tossuwan, Premchai, Apinuntakan, Sarunya, and Kitja for ratifying GEN?s prior investment in P Plus P Plc. ' s shares and warrants
considered in contravention of the second paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307 and 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) with Sections 83 and 86 of the
, respectively, to lure the investing public into their businesses.The aforesaid acts are deemed undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546
offence under Section 89/7 in conjunction with Section 89/10 and Section 89/11, and liable to the penalties under the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. The
of Directors pursuant to Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).KC must submit the amended financial statements, the Forms, and the results of the special audit to the SEC by
under the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546, it is therefore necessary to relax regulations to remove obstacle on business operation and enable more channels for managing risk from on exchange derivatives trading