, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The
B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and imparting the false statement with the intention to mislead any person concerning price sensitive information in contravention of Section 238 of the SEA and thus liable to
accounts. The acts of {A} {B} and {C} were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the
. The act of {A} was in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The acts
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The findings previously led to the sanctions imposed on ING Funds, Maris and Burim. In this connection, the SEC further probed into the case and found that from January 5
(1992) (SEA); while Usavadee and Perayuth?s actions, as aider and abettor, were in violation of Section 241 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code.As the three persons agreed to enter
violating the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).On February 21, 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand sentenced Kanchana to a five-year imprisonment for violating Section 315 in conjunction
CMO shares acquired during the latter period.The aforesaid actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the Settlement Committee therefore imposed
offences committed by Bordin and Noparat were liable to violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and Section 83