, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section 56, Sections 59, 238, 241, 246 and 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The

Bangkok, September 19, 2011- The SEC proposed amendment to the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) regarding provisions against unfair securities trading practices and supporting capital

; an increase of 6.14 million shares or 975.28 percent.  The above acts were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in

or registration from the SEC, which is a violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16. The said violation is subject to sanctions under Section 125 of an imprisonment up to three years

accounts.   The acts of {A} {B} and {C} were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the

inconsistent tender offer price or form for all shareholders was deemed a violation of the tender offer rules promulgated under Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The SEC therefore

?s information disclosure system. Earlier, the auditor had, in accordance with Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), informed the company?s audit committee of the

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The findings previously led to the sanctions imposed on ING Funds, Maris and Burim. In this connection, the SEC further probed into the case and found that from January 5

action by placing trading orders through other persons? trading accounts and making payment for such transactions.Swake?s action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

. (FOCUS) share price during April 24-25, 2008. His offense is in violation of Section 243 (1), Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 in conjunction with Section 86 of the