aiders. In this regard, {A}, {B} and {C} were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 and Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed
report, the SEC probed into the case and found that the said companies and persons, without obtaining license under Section 90 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA), jointly operated
Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
the inside information were liable to violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535. Meanwhile, Somsak and Areeya, as aiders and abettors of Pittaya and Athueck, were in
and Section 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in December 2014, it was after the SEC's probe had revealed such
Section 243(1) in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code, while {F} {G} {H} {I} and {J} violated
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate fraud in accordance with Section 90 of the Penal Code. In addition, he was also sentenced to serve 8-year
LIMITED ASIA SERMKIJ LEASING PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN INSULATORS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN MARINE SERVICES PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN PHYTOCEUTICALS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN SEA CORPORATION
LIMITED ASIA SERMKIJ LEASING PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN INSULATORS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN MARINE SERVICES PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN PHYTOCEUTICALS PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED ASIAN SEA CORPORATION