court will judge the case, respectively.Information contained in this news release is as of the aforementioned release date. For those who wish to see current status of the matter, please go to compliant

Limited and (4) Asia Pacific Drilling Engineering Company Limited. This case is under consideration by the court of first instance. SEC Act S.312 281/2 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 89/7 and 89/7 in

Songkhla Company Limited and (4) Asia Pacific Drilling Engineering Company Limited. This case is under consideration by the court of first instance. SEC Act S.312 281/2 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 89

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA

Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA