/ActandRoyalEnactment/Act/act-derivatives2546-codified.pdf(1) มาตรา 66 ในกรณีที่มีความจำเป็น ศูนย์ซื้อขายสัญญาฯ จะออกกฎเกณฑ์เพื่อใช้บังคับเป็นการชั่วคราวได้โดยไม่ต้องดำเนินการตามมาตรา 63 ในการนี้ต้องปฏิบัติให้เป็นไปตาม
received and keep the general public from realizing of such obligation. The above offences were in violation of Section 307, 311, 312(1)(2)(3) and 313 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 in several
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed a fine on him in the amount of 48,127,389.54 baht. As aider and abettor, Pathaipoom and Chalalai were deemed to
and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damages to the company but
violating Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate
Bangkok, March 22, 2016 ? The SEC is seeking public comments on the proposals to amend several provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (SEA) B.E. 2535 (1992) and the Provident Fund (PVD) Act
business without license or registration with the SEC in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) and thus liable under Section 125 of the same Act to imprisonment for a term not
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both
of Section 9 and the third paragraph of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) which contain certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and liberty of persons which Section 29