market personnel for the period of one year. ----------------*Their actions were in violation of Clauses 20(1) and 20(2) of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555

are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022 Settlement Committee Order No. 175/2022 http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en

Electronic Information System which are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022 Settlement Committee Order No. 175/2022 http

Dated 11/11/2022 Thailand’s Electronic Information System which are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022 Settlement Committee

Committee Order No. 175/2022 Dated 11/11/2022 Thailand’s Electronic Information System which are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11

providing assistance or facilitation to Pasu. The acts of Pasu, Vichan, and Akarat were liable to be an offense of colluding to manipulate securities price in violation of Section 244/3(1)(2) in conjunction

Decree without proper license, in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code.The SEC has therefore

liable to collusion to commit a fraud and failure to perform duties with responsibility, discretion and integrity. NMG subsequently suffered damage from their violation or failure to perform duties

(2016). In the case of Preeya, she assisted or facilitated Woraphant in his wrongdoing under Section 242(1), which was in violation of Section 315, in conjunction with Section 242(1) and subject to the

company for 5 years, and as major shareholder of derivatives business operator for 10 years.   Due to the deficiencies in duty performance of Mr. King, SKFM was subject to violation of Section 117