.  Such information includes cash account, purchases and sales transactions in cash, executive remuneration, tax penalty, and accounts receivable previously recorded as stock under consignment in 2011 and

Settlement Committee, therefore, imposed penalty fines of 4,587,214.99 baht and 500,000 baht on Pimpa and Nophadol, respectively.

financial statements. Such information included cash account, purchases and sales transactions in cash, executive remuneration, tax penalty, and accounts receivable previously recorded as stock under

information. The sanctions include a total payment of 19,339,187 baht (comprising civil penalty, compensation at an equal amount to the benefit received or should have been received, and reimbursement of

under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty and a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the offense in a sum of 558,405 Baht together

defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to jointly reimburse court fees to

a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to

paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the

show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and

financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the