paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Sections 307, 308, 311 and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).His above actions caused NIPPON?s failure to record and
281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Sections 307, 308, 311 and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).His above actions caused NIPPON's failure to record and prepare its
and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damages to the company but
SEC found from conversation records that {A} had obtained authorizations to make trading decisions for the clients. {A}'s actions are deemed in violation of Clause 20(2) and (3) of the Notification of
for investment in securities and derivatives. The said actions were done under the name ?Nateethong? through the web blog: URL http://nateethong.bloggang.com. Due to the fact that Yuttana was neither
has other measures which are adequate and sufficient to compensate for the compliance with the regulations or conditions to be exempted. The granting of exemptions under the first paragraph shall take
specified in the Licensing Manual for the Public and that the submission of the cancellation of SEC Account is part of the actions according to the SEC Office’s Standard Procedures. The SEC Office is obliged
matters: (1) Granting a waiver from an event of default in the case where the company is unable to carry out the following actions: - Closing the bondholders' register at least 14 days before the
to the Anti-money Laundering Office (AMLO) for consideration of actions within their authority as the offenses in this case constitute predicate offenses under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542