rules were deemed as a violation of Clause 14(2) of the SEC Office Notification No. SorKhor.49/2552 Re: Approval for Investor Contacts and Standards of Conduct dated October 14, 2009 and Clause 20(2) of

clients by virtue of their actions. The {D} case is deemed as using client account to trade securities for herself by using non-financial institution loans. Their misconducts are therefore in violation of

neither account owner nor account owner's appointee; failing to keep confidential client's information; and failing to keep records of investment advice and clients' trade order instructions; in violation

later informing the client at the end of the day. The acts of {B} , {E}, {F}, and {G} were in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555

companies and the sale of black steel to Thai Niche, BF, and KSC, with support from BF, KSC, Jalernrat, and Thai Niche, were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also

market personnel for the period of one year. ----------------*Their actions were in violation of Clauses 20(1) and 20(2) of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555

are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022 Settlement Committee Order No. 175/2022 http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en

Electronic Information System which are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022 Settlement Committee Order No. 175/2022 http

Dated 11/11/2022 Thailand’s Electronic Information System which are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11/2022 Settlement Committee

Committee Order No. 175/2022 Dated 11/11/2022 Thailand’s Electronic Information System which are in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.35 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 11