? former investor contact, {B}, had sent trading orders through the client's account without record and evidence of trading orders. His misconduct caused damage to the client and the firm dismissed him from

issuing short-term bill of exchange in return where he then took the money for himself not for the company, causing the company 20 million baht of damage. His misconducts were in violation of the second

of exchange in return where he then took the money for himself not for the company, causing the company 20 million baht of damage. His misconducts were in violation of the second paragraph of Section

solicitation when in fact the public company did not even file an application for share offering, thus never listed on the SET as previously claimed. The clients suffered damage as a result.   The misconducts of

damage from proceeding accordingly. The first case involves four entities, namely: (1) Gilt Edge International (Group) Ltd. ? Thailand representative office, represented by Mrs. Karen Elizabeth Entwistle

make securities borrowing and lending (SBL) trading decisions on the client's behalf in the client's cash account; thereby causing damage to the client. {B} admitted that he had obtained the

the ECD for further proceedings.  At this juncture, any person suffering damage from investment with the said person should contact the ECD Police at 0-2237-1199 for further legal proceedings.??At

institution who contributed to the damage or shared the responsibility for the damage incurred to such financial institution whose license was revoked, operation controlled or suspended due to a rehabilitation

the authority; (2) where it is an urgent case that delay will cause serious damage to any person or affect public interest; (3) where the fact was given by the alleged person in the explanation or

leaving the regulatory sandbox upon or before expiration. (5) specifying a limited scope of services to alleviate material impacts or damage on investors or the overall capital market, for example, types or