), Section 244 and Section 243 (2) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA.In September 2012
deemed as share price manipulation in contravention of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code. The
paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.312 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.312 315 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307