from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of
violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of Economic Crime
processing and confirming the redemption orders in violation of the tax terms; (2) In the case of {B}, she was found to sign the redemption orders without double-checking the correctness of
or registration from the SEC, which is a violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16. The said violation is subject to sanctions under Section 125 of an imprisonment up to three years
violation of the rules. The SEC therefore suspended them from duty as approved investment consultants for one month. The aforesaid misconduct is in violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital
derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of an imprisonment up to
were sentenced to a six-month imprisonment and a fine of 200,000 baht for the violation which occurred during January 2 - August 17, 1992 and a one-year and six-month imprisonment and a fine of 500,000
deemed a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under
violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the