exist. Therefore, personnel of asset management companies who are responsible for the funds? operations must perform their duties honestly for the best interest of their clients. They must also comply

. They must render services and perform duties honestly in compliance with professional standards and codes of conduct. On the other end, investors themselves must strictly abide by trading regulations

and honestly in violation of Section 89/7 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), which caused him or other persons to gain benefit and was consequently liable to the penalties as prescribed

failure to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly under Section 307, Section 308, Section 311, Section 312 and Section 313 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7

, which Sakkarin confirmed that it could be done, but no money from the sale order was deposited into the client's bank account.Sakkarin's aforesaid misconduct was a failure to perform duty honestly by

possession, nor did she return the borrowed money to the client as agreed.The misconduct of Nutnicha was failure to perform duties honestly by committing wrongful acts against clients’ assets, which was a

further appropriate action can be taken in time.?                           ______________________________  *Failure to perform duties honestly under Clause 23(1) and failure to perform duties

the 11 investment consultants were deemed a failure to perform duties or provide services honestly as they sought to gain personal benefits from investors through their job operation, or a violation of

for making their own trading decision to prevent embezzlement and misappropriation of their assets. Importantly, investment consultant must perform the duty honestly, adhere to professional standards

consultant to do so.    Auracha's actions were deemed as (1) failure to perform duties or provide services honestly, (2) misconduct upon the client's asset, (3) use of the client's trading account to trade