of the Emergency Decree. However, Bitazza and FreedomVerse carried out such activities without obtaining the required licenses, thereby violating Section 26, which shall be liable under Section 66
digital asset dealer business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree. However, Exmix carried out such activities without obtaining the required licenses, thereby violating Section 26 and being subject to
constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The statute of limitations ran
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and Section
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and
considered to be the giving of false statements to the SEC, constituting an offense under Section 76 of the Emergency Decree.In this regard, Mr. Sakolkorn Sakavee and Mr. Thaweesap Rawan, directors of