deemed manipulation of TYM share price in violation of Sections 243 in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and Section 83 of the Penal Code
Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares. The Court inflicted the punishment of 2
November 13, 2018, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares. The Court
statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about
. Segments total may not match to IVL due to holdings segment. Excluding Feedstock price adjustment for captive sales to PET on freight saving. There are no impacts on regional or consolidated EBITDA. Summary
and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damages to the company but
Sections 89/24, 278, 281/10 in conjunction with Sections 300, 306, and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) (as the case may be), the SEC therefore has filed a complaint against
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended (SEA), as follows: Apichart’s acts violated Section 242 (1), Eng’s acts violated Sections 242 (2) and 315, and Supanee’s acts violated Section 242 (1