July 27 ? August 10, 2011, Yongyuth, then CEO of TUCC, told Vorakun to sell 17,475,100 TUCC shares in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to TUCC share

percent of its shares in the manner that taking an advantage over other investors due to the use of negative non-public information material to {X1} share price. The said information was about {X1}'s Q1

non-public information material to SPSU share price.  As {A} was one of the sellers comprising SPSU, S.P. International Co., Ltd. (SPI) and some of family members, they learnt of a draft Memorandum of

were made in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to {X1} Company share price. The information, of which they learnt as {X1} Company directors, was about

material to {X1} Company share price. The purchases were made through trading accounts of his son in which Sumit was an authorized person. In late 2012, {A} learned of the information concerning {X1} Company

traded {X1} Company shares in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to {X1} Company share price which was {X1} Company's 315.79 million operating net loss in

positive non-public information material to PLE share price. As PLE?s chairman of the board, chairman of executive committee, and chairman of foreign debt collection committee, he learnt of the information

this case, the SEC?s probe found that Yongyuth and Vorapin had sold TUCC shares in such a way that taking advantage of others by using non-public information material to TUCC share price. They learnt of

SEC?s probe found that during April 23 ? May 14, 2012, Sermkhun had purchased CMO shares through his securities trading account by using non-public information material to CMO share price concerning CMO

based on the company positive non-public information material to {X1} share price. It was the information on merger of {X1} with {X2} Plc. by means of entire business transfer during 2010-2011. The merger