16 million from same quarter last year. For the Company only, the gross profit was Baht 82 million, a decrease of Baht 2 million from same quarter last year while for the subsidiary company’s gross
the day of appointment, the defendant did not show up to court and did not file a lawsuit to resolve the case. The Company testified our only side of argument and the hearing was to be decided on the
the day of appointment, the defendant did not show up to court and did not file a lawsuit to resolve the case. The Company testified our only side of argument and the hearing was to be decided on the
witness testimony on February 22, 2017. However, on the day of appointment, the defendant did not show up to court and did not file a lawsuit to resolve the case. The Company testified our only side of บมจ
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) Readers should be aware that only the original Thai text has legal force and that this English translation is strictly for reference. 2 Notification of the Securities and
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) Readers should be aware that only the original Thai text has legal force and that this English translation is strictly for reference. Notification of the Securities and
(UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION) Readers should be aware that only the original Thai text has legal force and that this English translation is strictly for reference. Notification of the Securities and
companies, and pay expenses incurred in connection with the investigation of the offense.** However, they were not willing to settle the case with the SEC. The SEC, therefore, issued a letter to request
190.4 million when comparing with the prior year same quarter decreased Baht 1.8 million. For the Company only, the gross profit was Baht 184.1 million increased from the prior year same quarter at Baht
Company Limited has paid the fine. The case is regarded as settle. SEC Act S.33 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 06/09/2016