the others. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry
the others. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry
. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17
together with the others. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
together with the others. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17/12/2012
inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint against each alleged offender and its related person. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17/12/2012
imposed on them and paid separate civil penalties at the total amount of more than 120 million baht. The six offenders are: (1) Mr. Sathit Roongwatanapak, (2) Mr. Chavin Roongwatanapak, (3) Ms. Tanyapa
segment on Q3 2018 are following; EPC service 31.96% of total revenue, then SMP & E&I service 28.73%, Civil & Building service 27.74%, and Fabrication and other service 11.57%, respectively. Revenue from
above for colluding or getting involved in the offense related to the fabrication of STARK’s financial statements for the year 2022*. As such, the four persons above were in a position to know that the