cases, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both

the world’s large oil producers. Heavy sell-off of shares was evident, which triggered the “circuit breaker” of the Stock 8 Exchange of Thailand in order to temporarily suspend share trading for the

Operators B.E. 2559 (2016) ______________________ By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No

. 2559 (2016) ______________________ By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 88

, the group percentage after theacquisition/disposition and the person(s) under Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 . Preliminary version: incomplete and/or being reviewedinformation

after theacquisition/disposition and the person(s) under Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 . Preliminary version: incomplete and/or being reviewedinformation. Revised version: new

/disposition, the group percentage after theacquisition/disposition and the person(s) under Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 . Preliminary version: incomplete and/or being

virtue of Section 4/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) , as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 6) B.E. 2562 (2019 ), and Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4

virtue of Section 4/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 6) B.E. 2562 (2019), and Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4