violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the

of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the

of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the

of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the

a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under

deemed a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under

but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public

derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 25/06/2009

record fictitious car sale revenues worth Baht 30 million. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.307 308 309 311 312 313 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official

company is licensed to operate derivatives business. Later, the company took possession of the deceived investors’ assets. Such actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of the Criminal