possession of the deceived investors’ assets. Such actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of the Criminal http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en/Enforce Criminal Complaint Filed with an

. Later, the company took possession of the deceived investors’ assets. Such actions were deemed to be a public frauds under Section 343 of the Criminal http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en/Enforce

ซื้อ” (meaning “No Sign, No buy” in Thai), and Line Open Chat named “Stop Loss Club”, which enabled Bybit to be well known and attracted more persons to use Bybit’s service.The actions of Bybit are

service.The actions of Bybit are deemed to be an operation of the digital asset exchange business without license pursuant to Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses whereby Bybit has

with them. Some even gave authorization for the companies? staff to submit trading orders on their behalf.The said actions were deemed as undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention

paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Sections 307, 308, 311 and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).His above actions caused NIPPON?s failure to record and

281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Sections 307, 308, 311 and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).His above actions caused NIPPON's failure to record and prepare its

and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be.  The said actions also caused damages to the company but

SEC found from conversation records that {A} had obtained authorizations to make trading decisions for the clients. {A}'s actions are deemed in violation of Clause 20(2) and (3) of the Notification of

for investment in securities and derivatives. The said actions were done under the name ?Nateethong? through the web blog: URL http://nateethong.bloggang.com. Due to the fact that Yuttana was neither