. Pongsak Lothongkam’s action constitutes an offense for buying securities while knowing or possessing inside information as specified in Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), Section 243(2) and

all 10 offenders with the DSI for consideration of further legal actions. In this regard, since the offenses in this case also constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E

provide services with loyalty* by committing wrongful acts against investors’ assets, which was an offense liable to revocation of approval as investment consultant. However, the approval as securities

misunderstanding and subsequently an impact on the securities price or investors’ decisions on securities investment may be liable to be an offense of unfair act under the Securities and Exchange Commission Act B.E

committed an offense under Section 89/25*, for example, taking the assets of the juristic person with dishonest intent, obtaining unlawful gains which damages the juristic person, or altering, shortening

misconduct of MRC - BIZ is liable to offering for sale of digital tokens and operating digital asset exchange without license, which is a legal offense under Section 17 and Section 26 subject to the

that indicates that a director, manager or the person responsible for the operation of a juristic person may have committed an offense under Section 89/25, for example, taking the assets of the

this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities and derivatives trading practices also constitute a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999) and related

securities companies. In this regard, since the offenses relating to unfair securities trading practices are also listed as a predicate offense under the Anti-Money Laundering Act B.E. 2542 (1999), the SEC has

suspended. On March 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand reversed the Appeal Court's ruling that Suree was a principal in jointly committing the offense with Chompoonuch in one count in accordance with