Section 300 in conjunction with Section 278 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (the “Securities and Exchange Act”), in the case where ETL concealed material facts regarding the interim dividend
conjunction with Section 278 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (the “Securities and Exchange Act”), in the case where ETL concealed material facts regarding the interim dividend payment in September
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the SEC Act
and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of the
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. On October 3, 2018, the Bangkok South Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 90 and 289 of
without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289, and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003