to Ariya, a contravention of Section 242(2) in conjunction with Section 243(2), subject to the liabilities under Section 296 and 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as
actions of the persons above are deemed offenses under Section 244/3(1)(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 or in conjunction with Sections 83 and
/5 and 244/6, as the case may be, subject to the liabilities under Sections 296, 296/1 and 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with Section 83 of the
/5 or Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Criminal Code, subject to the penalties under Section 296
Surapol was deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). These individuals are subject to the penalties under
___________________ By virtue of Section 18 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) , which contains certain provisions relating to the restriction of the rights and liberty of persons which Section 29 in conjunction
___________________ By virtue of Section 18 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), which contains certain provisions relating to the restriction of the rights and liberty of persons which Section 29 in conjunction
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which contain certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and liberties of persons, which Section 29 in conjunction with Section 33, Section 34, Section 41, Section
Address fb sec.or.th Laws/Regulations Laws / Regulations Search Acts/Royal Enactments Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives Act Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses Provident Fund Act Emergency