. Such activities were in violation of Section 244/3 (1) and (2), the presumption under Section 244/5 and Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with

contravention of Section 240 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), subject to the penalties under Paragraph 1 of Section 296 and Section 296/2 and the civil penalties under Section 317/4 and

296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2559 (2016), as amended, (SEA). As aider and abettor, Amornrat and Walailuk violated Section 315 in conjunction with Section 242(1) which

and Exchange Commission No. KorThor. 61/2543 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Operational Control in Securities Underwriting _____________ By virtue of Section 14 and Section 116 of the

. KorThor. 61/2543 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Operational Control in Securities Underwriting _____________ By virtue of Section 14 and Section 116 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535

Securities and Exchange Commission No. KorThor. 61/2543 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Operational Control in Securities Underwriting _____________ By virtue of Section 14 and Section 116 of the

, Conditions and Procedures for Providing Services as Securities Registrar By virtue of Section 16/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No.4) B.E

above actions are liable to be in violation of Section 312 and Section 281/10 in conjunction with Section 300 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) (as the case may be).Therefore, the

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) had imposed a fine on Lalana in the amount of 36,815,524.26 baht for manipulative trading by colluding with others in providing and using other persons

, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and