. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. SEC Act S.89/7 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 03/09/2009
prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 21/03/2011
prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 21/03/2011
and Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 16/12/2011
accused; however, the accused escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the accused to trial. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed
Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 16/12/2011
to issue a prison sentences for 1st and 3rd defendants. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 30/01/2012
lure the investing public into their businesses. The aforesaid act was deemed undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This
concerning money withdrawal to mislead others. The aforesaid acts were in contravention of Section 315 of the SEA in conjunction with Sections 307, 308, 311, and 312 of the SEA. SEC Act S.315 Criminal