of Securities Companies _____________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 103 (4) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551
of Securities Companies _____________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 103 (4) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 4) B.E. 2551
Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor/Nor/Khor. 26/2551 Re: Rules, Conditions and Procedures for Being Executive of Securities Companies _____________ By virtue of Section 16/6 and Section 103 (4) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and because CGH is a listed company, Chupong has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to
company, {A} has also contravened Section 89/7 by failing to perform duties responsibly and honestly, which is liable to the penalties under the second paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA, in conjunction
Mr. Vudhiphol Suriyabhivadh Mr. Vudhiphol Suriyabhivadh as the vice chairman of the board of directors of L.P.N. Development Public Company Limited ("LPN"), chairman of the Audit Committee
Mr. Suriya Suriyabhivadh Mr. Suriya Suriyabhivadh, son of Mr. Vudhiphol Suriyabhivadh who is the vice chairman of the board of directors of L.P.N. Development Public Company Limited ("LPN"
offense under Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), subject to the penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).By allowing Dr
Exchange Commission No. Kor Jor. 20/2541 Re: Determination of an Additional Type of Securities _________________ By virtue of Section 4 and Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), the
Company Limited (“BAY”). Being the person responsible for BAY’s operations, she failed to issue orders or omitted to perform her duties as required. This pertains to the case where BAY, acting as the